Hello Yitzchak, Thursday, January 4, 2007, 4:25:06 PM, you wrote:
>>> The other is awkwardness in extending the capabilites >>> of ST. For that, I would propose that the function "unsafeRunST" >>> be added to the library. > Bulat Ziganshin wrote: >> this function exists, but named unsafeIOtoST. > That wasn't what I had in mind, because it forces the > thread parameter to take the specific value RealWorld. this parameter don't have any "physical" meaning at runtime. i still think that it is just what you mean. what other meaning may have unsafeRunST operation? -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
