David House wrote:
I've added a bit more explanation, so it may now be palatable. It is
quite a hard exercise, though, perhaps it shouldn't come so early on.

In my opinion, it is now much more clear. And it is a very
instructive example.

If people still find it too hard, you could add the additional
hint: Keep in mind that there are no morphisms
other than the ones shown in the diagram.

Regards,
Yitz
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to