Hello Tim,

Saturday, January 27, 2007, 10:23:31 PM, you wrote:

>> Humm.  While I can accept that this is a valid criticism of Haskell's monadic
>> structure for dealing with I/O, I fail to see how it could drive a decision
>> to prefer an imperative language like C#, where every statement has this
>> property (overspecification of evaluation order).

> True.. perhaps his objection was related to having a bulky syntax (one

on *practice*, C++ compilers can reorder statements. are this true for
Haskell compilers?


-- 
Best regards,
 Bulat                            mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to