On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 02:46:27AM +0300, Bulat Ziganshin wrote: > 2. it bites me too. it's why i say that C++ is better imperative > language than Haskell.
> there are also many other similar issues, such as lack of good syntax > for "for", "while", "break" and other well-known statements, On the other hand you have an ability to define your own control structures. > inability to use "return" inside of block and so on "inability" is an exaggeration - you can use the ContT monad transformer, which even allows you to choose how "high" you want to jump. But you probably already know this and just want to point that it is cumbersome? Best regards Tomasz _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
