OK, thanks! Regards, Yitz
Cale Gibbard wrote:
The splittable idea isn't mine, it looks like perhaps Remi Turk did it. One thing which I'd recommend is including getRandom, getRandomR as implemented in terms of getR and the ordinary random operations, simply because they're the two most common uses, it's probably worth it to define them separately. Also, getRandoms and getRandomRs would still be convenient to have in the library, and should do appropriate splitting of the generator.
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
