I think seq is funny because it is not lambda definable.
All other constructs in H98 are (except for ! on data types which is
defined in terms of seq).
-- Lennart
On Feb 8, 2007, at 01:12 , Yitzchak Gale wrote:
Haskell is a non-strict language, so non-strict
values are legitimate, and so is seq. I don't
see how seq is any more funny than irrational
numbers are irrational or imaginary numbers
are imaginary.
Regards,
Yitz
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
