One of my questions surely should have been: 5) Does haddock.ghc build? Does it work?
I succeeded in getting it compiled (I filled in the missing data definition of DocOptions, hacked it to always use [] for the options anyway, manually set the compilerPath, and maybe more). Unfortunately it dies upon start-up: the GHC sub-session is panicing by accessing the static options global variable too early. This is over my head concerning GHC and Cabal internals. I'm really eager to use this, so I can help if need be. Thanks. On 2/15/07, David Waern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
15 feb 2007 kl. 18.19 skrev Nicolas Frisby: > I am very ready for a Haddock that can swallow infix typenames. Yes, Haddock-GHC can do that. > In dons's recent overview of the last SoC, a darcs repo for Waern's > project was listed. I jumped at the link but couldn't find much > documentation (i.e. the README file is GHC's, not the SoC project's). > Some Google queries followed with no success. > That repo is the GHC branch that I was working on, and it's not relevant anymore, since it has been merged into GHC HEAD. The repository for the actual program is at: http://darcs.haskell.org/SoC/ haddock.ghc > My questions for Waern or anyone else who knows where to look: > > 1) Where to look for more complete documentation? There is no special documentation for Haddock-GHC yet. > 2) Is the implementation integrated into GHC yet? GHC head? > Separate repo? Yes, it is integrated in GHC HEAD. > 3) What Haddock features are supported as of yet? Most of the things that was supported in Haddock in August, except for e.g. Hoogle output and such things. > 4) Is it still actively developed. Yep, although not so fast :) /David
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
