On 20/02/07, David Roundy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's rather a small function to bother putting in the libraries, and I
think better expressed using map directly:

rmap fs x = map ($ x) fs

Yes. Now that I know the idiom, there's clearly little point in having
a named function for it.

Thanks,
Paul.
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to