DavidA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I suggest << in place of $. For example: > h x = f << g << x
I would feel better with : " |> " Ideally, redesigning Haskell syntax for 21st century should take more scientific course. But with know-how here still much lagging we can only tap on experience with symbol manipulation in mathematics. For instance: construction of formulas should store some dynamics supportive for the underlying thought process. So for example "f a b" springs up no association while "f(a, b)" kick-starts the right thought. Cheers, -Andrzej _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
