On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 09:20:12PM -0700, Tim Chevalier wrote: > On 4/11/07, Stefan O'Rear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >If you want to be really explicit about it, here is a sort that will > >work: > > > >sort [] = [] > >sort l@(x:_) = filter (<x) l ++ filter (==x) l ++ filter (>x) l > > > >(A stable quicksort, btw) > > You may be missing a few recursive calls there :-)
Indeed. Stefan _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
