Both Yitzchak's and my suggestions should run in constant space--some
strictness annotation or switching to foldl' might be necessary.

On 4/12/07, Mark T.B. Carroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dan Weston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Ah, but which k elements? You won't know until you've drained your
> entire stream!

True, but you still don't need to keep the whole stream in memory at
once, just the k-least-so-far as you work your way through the stream -
once you've read a part of the stream you can mostly forget it again.
The question as I understood it was one of if even in Haskell there's a
better way than sorting that means you need only have a fragment of the
stream in memory at once.

-- Mark

_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to