> No we don't! At least not anywhere near as much of an exaggeration as that
> statement would be about an strongly typed imperative language (sequencing
> can't be type checked*, imperative programs are mostly sequencing, thus
> imperative programs are mostly unchecked).
Actually, side effects *can* be type checked, but it's a lot more painful
(the type of an assignment is not nearly as simple as the one you're used to).
Stefan
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
