On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 07:09:10PM -0400, S. Alexander Jacobson wrote: > On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, Marc Weber wrote: > >>Right now, you can largely do the same thing, but you have to write the > >>XML > >>representations of your data structures manually. > >> > >>-Alex- > > > >I'm not sure but doesn't use HAppS kind of stripped down HaXml ? > >DrIft can derive HaXml instances automatically. > >Where is the problem doing using DrIft? > > > >Marc > >_______________________________________________ > >Haskell-Cafe mailing list > >Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > >http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe > > > > DrIFT is a preproxessor so it makes the build process more complex. I'd > like to find a pure-haskell solution or a TH solution that doesn't require > more build complexity.
You might want to look at the Data.Derive system. Basically it's a giant library of helpers for writing TH-based derivations. It has a few other cool features, like an automated guesser for sufficiently regular classes. It's still in the cleanup-for-release stage, so any questions should not be hesitated on! http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/fp/darcs/derive Primary maintainer: Neil Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (I'm very familiar with it, too) Stefan _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
