On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 05:49:11PM -0700, Juan Carlos Arevalo Baeza wrote: > I may be talking out of my other end here, but... if you want something > like parMap to calculate all the pixels in parallel, then... can't you use > parMap itself? > > Something like: > > weirdParMap action = sequence_ . map action . parMap (id $!) > > This evaluates all the elements of the list using parMap (the expensive > part, right?), and then sequentially applies the action on the current > thread.
You are. I'm devoting most of my brain cells to automatic deriving of TTypeable atm, but note that id is already strict, so (id $!) is equivalent to id. Stefan _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
