On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 10:08:41 +0100, Simon Marlow wrote: [..] >IMO we shouldn't allow both a library and an exe in the same package. >I think I argued against this originally, and my understanding is that >doing this is deprecated, although perhaps not visibly enough. >Whenever the question of what to do about lib+exe packages arises, the >discussion tends to spiral out of control into what we should do about >collections of packages in general. > >For now, the simple story is that each package should have either a >single library or a single executable (even multiple executables in a >package is questionable; if they share some code it shoud be in a >package).
So, you are saying that I should split my library and its test app(s) into separate packages? That would also mean that I have to install the library before compiling and running the tests, right? Hmmm, if that's the case then I have to say that cabal won't suit me very well. Are there any options to cabal? /M -- Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://therning.org/magnus
pgpogh7Z2G1Yr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
