On 17/05/07, Chad Scherrer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But GHC complains of "Empty 'do' construct".
Because it takes the indented following lines as being new bindings in the let-block. The trick is to intent them past the 'sum': let b = sum $ do y <- [0..x + 1] return y Or to bypass layout altogether: let { b = sum $ do y <- [0..x + 1] return y } (Of course, in this specific case I'd write sum [0..x + 1], but I guess that this is an example of a general case.) -- -David House, [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe