Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
For example, I was looking back at your ACIO mail a couple of months ago,
> when I was thinking about concurrency.
Actually, this is Ian Starks proposal.. http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2004-November/007664.html ..but is one with which I agree. I just wrote some stuff on the wiki about this actually solved some currently insoluble problems.
Not immediately achieving a critical mass behind a language change is not the
> same as being ignored. Unfortunately the situation seems worse than this. AFAICT we haven't even got a consensus that that there is a real problem here that needs any kind of solution :-) Regards -- Adrian Hey _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
