On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, bretm wrote: > Henning Thielemann wrote: > > > > Is your approach more like symbolic calculation or more like a > > representation for computable reals? > > > > http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Applications_and_libraries/Mathematics#Number_representations > > Computable reals, specifically continued fraction representation. I know I'm > reinventing the wheel here
Jan Skibinski did it for Haskell, too. > (I was using an OCaml implementation called ContFrac as a guide to the > algorithms) but I'm just playing with this as a vehicle for learning > Haskell. If you plan to use NumericPrelude, I'll glad to hear experiences about the usefulness of the NumericPrelude class hierarchy, and we could add it to that library. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
