> I second that. I particularly like the elimination of ]'s. We certainly
> need some symbol to separate the map and the key; but we do really need
> to also mark "here be the end of the key"?

and how (arr ! "key" ++ "data") should be parsed? :)


-- 
Best regards,
 Bulat                            mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to