> I second that. I particularly like the elimination of ]'s. We certainly > need some symbol to separate the map and the key; but we do really need > to also mark "here be the end of the key"?
and how (arr ! "key" ++ "data") should be parsed? :) -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe