PR Stanley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi > Can you think of a fourth way of redefining disjunct using pattern matching? > vee :: Bool -> Bool -> Bool > vee _ True = True > vee True _ = True > vee _ _ = False
In the same spirit: f False False = False f _ _ = True _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
