On Sun, 2007-17-06 at 22:37 +0100, David House wrote: > > Well, part 1 would be being *graphical*. I really have no time for ugly > > cryptic ASCII art "graphical" UIs... I just like being able to *see* > > what's happening. Is that too much to ask? > > Did you read the rest of my email? For every feature you cited I gave links > and > screenshots to the Emacs equivalents, none of which (AFAIK -- I don't actually > use them all) use ASCII art.
Got a file chooser that's actually a GUI that has the look and feel of every other GUI file chooser in existence? Because what I see in emacs now that I've got the X version working (aside from horrible, ugly, unreadable fonts -- again the Notepad of the GNOME world is kicking ass and taking names here!) is a half-assed GUI wrapped around a plain text-dominated interface. Kind of what you'd expect from people who think that GUIs are a waste of time and put one in just to say "we've got a GUI -- what are you talking about?" -- Michael T. Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (GoogleTalk: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) The most exciting phrase to hear in science - the one that heralds new discoveries - is not "Eureka!" but "That's funny..." (Isaac Asimov)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
