Hello Andrew,

Saturday, June 23, 2007, 4:02:54 PM, you wrote:
> The point being that lots of people look at Haskell and go "oh, that's
> very cute for writing trivial example code, but it can never be fast; 
> for that you must use C or C++".

and that's true :)  as i said, your C++ code is very far from perfect.
by comparing with bad code you can find that even Logo is faster than
asm


-- 
Best regards,
 Bulat                            mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to