Wouter Swierstra wrote: > I don't think you really want arrows here. The right idiom is > applicative functors (see Control.Applicative). You could then write the > above as: > > calculateStuff <$> x <*> y <*> z
I think you mean calculateStuff <$> performActionA <*> performActionB <*> performActionC Regards, apfelmus _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
