On 7/2/07, Gregory Propf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This was a bit baffling too. It appears that there's an implied argument to runTick. This also works and makes it more explicit. I suppose the compiler just works out that the only place to put the 'n' is after tick. runTick :: Int -> (String,Int) runTick n = runState tick n
Not exactly. Look up "currying". (Writing out the same definition with the argument "n" specified explicitly like you did is called "eta-expansion", by the way.) Cheers, Tim -- Tim Chevalier* catamorphism.org *Often in error, never in doubt "My writing is all completely autobiographical. That's why I write lesbian vampire stories." -- Jewelle Gomez _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
