That's cool -- good point.  takeWhile is also trivially defined in terms of 
foldr:

> takeWhile p = foldr (\x r -> if p x then x:r else []) []

Can you do dropWhile in terms of foldr?  I don't see how.

Mike

Stefan O'Rear wrote:
On Wed, Jul 04, 2007 at 04:20:20PM -0700, Michael Vanier wrote:
I'm sure this has been done a hundred times before, but a simple generalization of foldl just occurred to me and I wonder if there's anything like it in the standard libraries (I couldn't find anything). Basically, I was trying to define the "any" function in terms of a fold, and my first try was this:

any :: (a -> Bool) -> [a] -> Bool
any p = foldl (\b x -> b || p x) False
This is inefficient, because if (p x) is ever True the rest of the list is scanned unnecessarily.

Rather than create a new escape fold, it's much easier, simpler, and
faster just to use a right fold:

any p = foldr (\x b -> p x || b) False

That will short-ciruit well by laziness, and is made tailrecursive by
same.

Stefan
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to