Felipe Almeida Lessa wrote:
On 7/12/07, Andrew Coppin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How come the set of all sets doesn't exist?
http://www.google.com/search?q=set+of+all+sets
leads to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Set_of_all_sets which has the
answer, I think.
Ouch.
Clearly, set theory is way more complicated than people make out. (I
always thought a "set" was just a collection of objects...)
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
