On Sun, 2007-07-15 at 17:49 +0100, Andrew Coppin wrote: > This is a bit tangental, but... One problem I sometimes have is not > knowing the status of things. E.g., you read about Associated Types, and > then you go "hey, is this implemented now? is it being implemented soon? > etc." > > (Don't all rush in and tell me about ATs - I'm only picking it as an > example. Others include, say, the GHC debugger, stream fusion, parallel > arrays, etc etc etc.) > > Maybe I'm looking wrong, but it often isn't obvious to me how to figure > out the answer to the question "does all this cool stuff work yet?" I'm > not really sure what we could change to fix that though...
Ah, a question that can be answered with RTFM (http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/GHC) _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe