On 2007-07-27, David Roundy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The solution is to add explicit to the constructor for all single-argument > constructors (except perhaps occasionally when you actually want explicit > construction of objects). > > The reasoning behind this, of course, is to allow nice interactions of > home-made classes such as complex numbers, or string classes (which you > might want to be automatically constructed from string constants).
I'd have thought that adding an "implicit" keyword would make more sense, and only do conversions then. But I forget, C++. -- Aaron Denney -><- _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
