On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 10:27:47PM +0200, Björn Buckwalter wrote: > I am also assuming that the CGS system would not be employed when > working with temperature, amount or luminosity. This is evident in > the below type signatures where I have assumed zero extent in the > temperature, amount and luminosity dimensions. If this is incorrect > I would appreciate pointers to the CGS representation of these > dimensions. > > Please correct and inform me if my assumptions are wrong!
The temperature units are the same in CGS as in MKS (Kelvin). > This is a very rudimentary implementation. To make it more practical > a significant number of quantities and units, in particularly those > commonly used with the CGS, would need to be added. In the mean > time all units defined for the SI can be used with the CGS by > applying 'fromSI' to quantities defined from the SI units. > > If anyone is willing to add quantities/units (or other enhancements) > I will happily to accept patches. Personally I do not expect to use > this module and therefore do not intend to invest much more time > in it. If the module has other users I might reconsider. > > And of course, another direction of future work is to define > additional systems (e.g. natural, relativistic) using this module > as a template. I imagine this should be fairly straight forward. When atomic units are implemented, this could be useful for me... but alas I very seldom use Haskell for physics, and the effort to learn these modules seems unlikely to pay off soon. :( -- David Roundy Department of Physics Oregon State University _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe