Sebastian Sylvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd also like to reiterate my request for a notation that doesn't
> require brackets around the *action* but will also work by applying it
> to a function which when fully applied to its argument returns an
> action (i.e.: $foo x y + $bar z w, rather than $(foo x y) + $(bar z
> w)). Function application is normally very low-noise in Haskell
> (good), and it would be nice if we can keep it low-noise in this
> notation too.
I'm trying to understand your suggestion. Can you tell me how you'd
sugar the following?
getA :: Friggle MyA
getB :: Friggle MyB
foo :: Int -> MyB -> Friggle MyC
do a <- getA
b <- getB a
foo 42 b
--
Chris Smith
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
