Andrew Coppin wrote:
...does this mean Haskell is officially harder to understand than Lisp,
Java, Perl and O'Caml? :-}
(OTOH, does this mean Haskell is easier to understand than PHP or C++?)
Or, Haskell is the easiest to understand of them all.
Reason: Extremely large channel means so hard to understand that many
people want help. Extremely small channel means so hard to understand
that few people show interest. The middle-sized channel sits at the
sweet spot.
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
