On 9/23/07, Thomas Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -- this is the usual implementation right? > myreverse xs = foldl f [] xs > where f accum el = el : accum
This is often written reverse = foldl (flip (:)) [] which I quite like, because you can contrast it with foldr (:) [] which of course is just a type-restricted version of id. Stuart _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
