Wise your proposal is. Too long the desugaring I of languages functional
not understanding have labored. Anastrophe the rule should be. Working
have I been on a language Yoda that these rules implements it aspires to.
If the lojban/loglan schism is any precedent, Yoda will split soon
enough into prefix and postfix camps!
Jonathan Cast wrote:
On Tue, 2007-09-25 at 19:18 +0100, Brian Hulley wrote:
Brian Hulley wrote:
I'm wondering if anyone can shed light on the reason why
x # y
gets desugared to
(#) x y
and not
(#) y x
Can anyone think of an example where the current desugaring of infix
arguments gives the correct order when the function is used in a
postfix application? (apart from commutative functions of course!)
Sorry I meant to write "*prefix* application"
Of course, this is all a consequence of the well-known failure of
natural language: verbs come before their objects. It is thus natural
to write f(x), when in fact it is the object that should come first, not
the function. Switching to a (natural) language where (finite) verbs
come at the end of sentences, where they belong, should fix this issue
in time. Doing the same in a functional language would be ideal as
well, but might limit its use among those who speak inferior natural
languages.
jcc
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
