David Menendez wrote: > If desired, we could easily define a class for commutative monads, and > then state that ListT m is only a monad if m is a commutative monad.
If we do that, can I suggest that we use some name other than ListT for that? So far, we seem to agree that most practical applications use the new ListT. Thanks, Yitz _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe