On Nov 28, 2007 5:07 PM, Maurício <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry if I sound rude. I just saw a place for a > small joke, and used it. Chris code is pretty > elegant to what it is supposed to do. However, > knowing if a thread has finished is just 1 bit of > information. There's probably a reason why that > would hurt performance, but I don't understand > it.
Most threads either communicate some result---and you'll care about setting up a channel for that---or run forever. Some threads run on different computation engines. There's nothing in the Haskell spec that says I have to run the threads on a shared-memory machine. If the threads are distributed, then the channel to communicate back that one has finished may be very expensive. -Brian -- Brian T. Sniffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.evenmere.org/~bts _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
