On Dec 10, 2007, at 12:40 PM, Dan Piponi wrote:
On Dec 10, 2007 11:00 AM, Henning Thielemann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does Haskell need quick&dirty hackers?
The question isn't "Does Haskell need quick&dirty hackers?" It's
"would we get better software (using your favourite metric) if we put
Haskell into the hands of quick and dirty hackers?". I think the
answer might be yes.
You are so right - at least, to the extent that Haskell has any
potential
to exert a positive influence on anyone in that category. A lot of
these
wretched hackers are people who cared more about some end than
the means to it, and have accordingly accomplished things that are
now important ... and need to be maintained. To the despair of all
concerned.
I think you'll get a better Haskell, too. Don't let it turn into some
weird Gnostic cult where pneumatics liberate themselves from the
tainted bonds of earth by feasting on air and sunlight only.
Donn Cave
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
