On Dec 19, 2007 11:28 AM, Andre Nathan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I guess I could do away with StateT and just pass the PsMap around as a > parameter, but I guess that wouldn't be the haskell way...
I wouldn't say that. Manual state-passing is a perfectly legitimate technique, and can be clearer in some cases. Once your program works with manual state-passing, you might then find it easier to express using StateT -- or perhaps you'll decide that you didn't need StateT after all. Stuart _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
