On 12/26/07, Don Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Depending on laziness if fine, but depending on undefined strictness semantics > for particular types is more fragile. Whether Int or Bool or whatever > type has a strict or lazy accumulator in enumFromTo is entirely > unspecified -- you can't look up the report to check.
Right, I understand that. But is there any reason not to keep the Integer version of [a..] lazy, given that we can fix the stack overflow problem without introducing strictness? _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
