Jake McArthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I disagree. It might be the case that the _contents_ of the data  
> structure are lazy, in which case I would say the relevant
> constructor parameters should be made strict. As long as the
> structural parts are still lazy it should be okay.
> 
> And there's no harm in experimenting. :)
> 
Or, for that matter, guessing what -ddump-simpl looks like.

Which I never, ever, do. Seriously.

*lightens a cracker and runs away*

-- 
(c) this sig last receiving data processing entity. Inspect headers for
past copyright information. All rights reserved. Unauthorised copying,
hiring, renting, public performance and/or broadcasting of this
signature prohibited. 

_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to