Hello Mark, Thursday, January 3, 2008, 1:22:26 PM, you wrote:
because they have different models. i recommend you to start from learning this model, otherwise you will don't understand how Haskell really works and erroneously apply your OOP knowledge to Haskell data structures. shortly said, there are 3 ways to polymorphism: 1) C++ templates - type-specific code generated at compile time 2) OOP classes - every object carries VMT which allows to select type-specific operation 3) type classes - dictionary of type-specific operations is given as additional hidden argument to each function Haskell uses t.c. and its abilities are dictated by this implementation. there is no simple and direct mapping between features provided by OOP and t.c. > Can you give me a summary of why it's meaningless.....both would seem to > describe/construct values/objects....they may not be equivalent, but I > would expect some considerable overlap. > -----Original Message----- > From: Bulat Ziganshin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 02 January 2008 20:29 > To: Nicholls, Mark > Cc: haskell-cafe@haskell.org > Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] Is there anyone out there who can translate > C# generics into Haskell? > Hello Mark, > Wednesday, January 2, 2008, 7:40:31 PM, you wrote: >> I'm trying to translate some standard C# constucts into Haskell... > some > it's meaningless. read > http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/OOP_vs_type_classes > and especially papers mentioned in the References -- Best regards, Bulat mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
