Stefan O'Rear wrote:
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 10:13:12PM +0000, Adrian Hey wrote:
Also
remember that this behaviour never wastes more than 50% of the stack,
which is a relatively small amount.
Only if the stack is relatively small. Would you say the same about
heap, or about a stack that only needed 50% of heap space but ended
up using all of it? Or money? Using twice as much as you need of
anything is bad IMO.
Apparently you don't realize that GHC normally uses twice as much heap
as is needed, due to the decision to use a two-space copying collector
by default for the oldest generation. :)
Yikes again! It gets worse :-)
Perhaps I should have said *live* heap.
Regards
--
Adrian Hey
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
