Hi > But the point is that *both* heapGobbler and neilGobbler are likely to > be slower and chew through at least twice as much heap as stackGobbler, > which would be the implementation of choice for both simplicity and > performance if it wasn't for this stack management problem.
Sure? That sounds like the thing that people can conjecture, but benchmarks can prove. And I'd claim that neilGobbler is the simplest function by a large margin. Thanks Neil _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
