On Feb 6, 2008 8:47 PM, Alfonso Acosta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 7, 2008 2:30 AM, Bjorn Buckwalter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ok. Is this what people want -- one big hold-all library with > > everything, as opposed to smaller more specialized packages? I guess I > > can see advantages (real or perceived) to both approaches. > > Apart from Dockins' typenats library there are no other user-friendly > specific type-level libraries that know, so I cannot really tell if > people would prefer a hold-all library or a couple of more granular > specialized ones. > > Right now is not hold-all at all (it is still vaporware actually :)), > so I think there's no reason to discuss that at this point. Let's see > what people think.
Right, of course. I'll be taking a look at your no-longer-vaporware! ;) _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe