On Feb 6, 2008 8:47 PM, Alfonso Acosta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 7, 2008 2:30 AM, Bjorn Buckwalter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ok. Is this what people want -- one big hold-all library with
> > everything, as opposed to smaller more specialized packages? I guess I
> > can see advantages (real or perceived) to both approaches.
>
> Apart from Dockins' typenats library there are no other user-friendly
> specific type-level libraries that know, so I cannot really tell if
> people would prefer a hold-all library or a couple of more granular
> specialized ones.
>
> Right now is not hold-all at all (it is still vaporware actually :)),
> so I think there's no reason to discuss that at this point. Let's see
> what people think.

Right, of course. I'll be taking a look at your no-longer-vaporware! ;)
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to