On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 9:31 AM, Thomas Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 22 feb 2008, at 08.18, Jules Bean wrote: > > > > You can't call a stream-abstraction utility using a left-fold- > > enumerator without cheating (unsafeInterleave), because the stream- > > abstraction is incompatible (and leaky! even though it is convenient). > > > > You can convert in the other direction fine. > > > > Chunk are no problem, and convertible: you can build an element > > fold from a chunk fold, and a chunk fold from an element fold (as > > long as there is an 'end-of-input' marker). > > Hm, thinking about it, parsers just need to be able to return a > continuation instead of fail at the end of the input. This > continuation can then be invoked with the next chunk as input.
This is what I'll do and it is also what binary-strict's [1] IncrementalGet parser does. 1. http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/binary-strict-0.3.0 -- Johan _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
