On Mar 12, 2008, at 14:17 , Donn Cave wrote:
Sure. It isn't a lot of code, so I subjected it to Either-ization as an experiment, and I did indeed take the monad procedural route.
Monad != procedural, unless you insist on do notation. Think of it as composition (it may be easier to use (=<<) which "points the same direction" as (.)).
-- brandon s. allbery [solaris,freebsd,perl,pugs,haskell] [EMAIL PROTECTED] system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats] [EMAIL PROTECTED] electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon university KF8NH _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
