Neil Mitchell wrote:
Hi

I'm looking for interesting project to work on during Google Summer of
 Code. So I found [1]"A data parallel physics engine" ticket and got
 excited about it. I'd like to know interested mentors and community
 opinion about the complexity of such project.

I don't think there are a great deal of Haskell users who _really_
need a physics engine right now.

Well, we do :-) The idea is to provide a good testbed for NDP with some real-world appeal and a certain coolness factor.

Perhaps a nice direction to take this project would be to build an NDP
matrix library first, then use that library to build a physics engine
on top of it. A physics engine would certainly be very cool, and a
parallel matrix library would certainly be very much in demand.

The problem with dense matrices is that they are regular and NDP isn't too good at handling regular data structures at the moment. Our main focus is on irregular stuff like sparse matrices, trees and so on. Still, we'll see what happens.

Roman

_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to