On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 09:20 -0700, Don Stewart wrote: > g9ks157k: > > Am Donnerstag, 20. März 2008 07:09 schrieb Ben Lippmeier: > > > Hi All, > > > I'm pleased to announce the initial alpha release > > > of the Disciplined Disciple Compiler (DDC). > > > > > > Disciple is an explicitly lazy dialect of Haskell which includes: > > > - first class destructive update of arbitrary data. > > > - computational effects without the need for state monads. > > > - type directed field projections. > > > > > > All this and more through the magic of effect typing. > > > > > > More information (and download!) available from: > > > http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/DDC > > > or http://code.google.com/p/disciple > > > > > > DDC: more than lambdas. > > > > > > Onward! > > > Ben. > > > > Short question: Is it appropriate to put the homepage of a non-Haskell > > project > > on the Haskell Wiki? I mean, putting some basic info about such a project > > there and link to the project’s website might be okay and is already done > > in > > certain cases. But projects like Agda or Epigram typically don’t use > > haskell.org as a webspace provider and I think this is the way to go. What > > do others think? > > While YHC, lambdabot and xmonad do :) So I think the precedent has been > that anything written in Haskell, or any Haskell-like compiler, can be > happily hosted.
My experience has been that the Haskell community is and has been very supportive of such projects, and most Haskellers would be more than happy to have such a project on the Haskell Wiki. Pugs started on the Haskell wiki. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe