On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 5:09 PM, Marc Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Adding documentation ficilities to ghci is nice, > however my experience is that documentation is not complete everywhere. > That's why I'm looking at source code directly (thus having doc strings if > given > else I can have look at source directly).
This reminds me of a very handy feature in ipython (a custom python repl) - you can type name? which prints the docstring associated with name (which can be a function, module, class etc.) - but if you type name?? you get the docstring _and_ the source code (colorized and all :). I use it a lot when I'm experimenting in a interactive session. I could see something similar for haskell being very useful, to me at least. Arnar _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
