On Monday 24 March 2008, Don Stewart wrote: > Let's get a new faster Data.Map and other containers ready to go by the > end of the northern summer?
And while we are visiting this, can I put in a vote for a seperation between the default Data.* container concrete implementations and associated classes? E.g. between the cannonical Map implementation and a Map class that could (if I felt mad) be backed by a list, or (if I was more sane) the cannonical Map datatype? This would go /at least/ for Map, Set, List. Matthew > > -- Don > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
