Hello,
On Mar 23, 2008, at 18:53, Albert Y. C. Lai wrote:
You are right, there is no harm generalizing deep, since a related
combinator, multi, has the more general type.
thanks for the reply! Perhaps I'll suggest the generalization to the
HXT authors. Meanwhile, I've discovered examples of just the kind of
thing I'm trying to do at http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/HXT/Practical/
.
Meanwhile, I don't think
deep (hasName "a") >>> getLink
looks too bad. :)
That's true, it was a bad example. It's just that if getLink already
includes the hasName test, the above seems redundant.
Cheers
Robert
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
